- Azure FinOps Essentials
- Posts
- Azure FinOps Essentials
Azure FinOps Essentials
When Architecture Meets Cost: Rethinking Cloud Patterns Through a FinOps Lens
Hi there, and welcome to this week’s edition of Azure FinOps Essentials! 🎉
You’ve cleaned up your unused resources. You’ve optimized SKUs. You’ve tagged everything with military precision. Yet… your cloud bill still spikes in ways you can’t explain.
This week, we’re exploring a more subtle source of cloud spend: architectural patterns that are operationally sound but financially expensive. They’re not misconfigurations or forgotten VMs, but design choices that unintentionally drive up costs.
Cheers,
Michiel
Get Your Free ChatGPT Productivity Bundle
Mindstream brings you 5 essential resources to master ChatGPT at work. This free bundle includes decision flowcharts, prompt templates, and our 2025 guide to AI productivity.
Our team of AI experts has packaged the most actionable ChatGPT hacks that are actually working for top marketers and founders. Save hours each week with these proven workflows.
It's completely free when you subscribe to our daily AI newsletter.
When Sound Cloud Patterns Quietly Inflate Spend
Not every cost spike stems from waste or bad practice. Often, it’s the result of architectural patterns working exactly as intended, just not from a financial perspective.
These are patterns built for resilience, scale, observability, or developer experience. The issue is not that they fail, but that they succeed in ways that quietly increase consumption.
Consider a few examples:
Retry storms
One request fails. The client retries. So does the proxy. So does every downstream microservice. What began as one request ends as ten. Each one billed.
Aggressive health probes
Load balancers and gateways check backend health every few seconds. With enough instances and components, this generates a constant stream of synthetic traffic that produces logs, metrics, and downstream invocations.
Chatty microservices
A single user action calls ten different services. Each call generates diagnostic traces, logs, and often additional internal calls. Billing models based on execution count or message volume quickly add up.
Over-instrumentation
Every component logs everything, all the time. Sampling is off. Retention is long. Logs are sent to multiple destinations. Your observability stack becomes one of your biggest cloud consumers.
Cold-start mitigation
To avoid delays in serverless workloads, you send fake traffic to keep instances warm. It works operationally, but each ping still consumes resources and may trigger downstream effects.
These aren’t anti-patterns. They’re mature, often recommended practices. But without cost-awareness, they can behave like silent cost multipliers.
If you’ve already optimized usage and right-sized infrastructure but still see unexplained cost trends, it’s time to examine how your architecture might be working against your budget.
Designing for Resilience and Efficiency
You don’t have to choose between reliability and cost control. The goal is not to strip down your architecture, but to make deliberate, cost-aware decisions about how it behaves. That starts with visibility.
1. Make the invisible visible
Start by quantifying architectural behaviors. How many requests are internal versus external? Which logs are written the most? What triggers downstream calls?
Use tools like Azure Monitor, Application Insights, or third-party observability platforms to trace patterns, not just performance. Correlate telemetry with cost data to find patterns that align with spend spikes.
Key metrics to look for:
Request fan-out ratios
Retry frequency and duration
Internal service-to-service traffic volume
Log and metric ingestion rates
2. Introduce guardrails
Once you identify the patterns, introduce controls:
Add retry budgets: Cap the number of retries per call chain. Use exponential backoff and circuit breakers to avoid amplification.
Throttle health probes: Lower the frequency of synthetic checks, especially in off-hours or for low-impact services. Or make them conditional based on recent activity.
Tune observability: Apply log sampling, reduce retention, exclude known-noise patterns, and consolidate destinations. You can also delay ingestion to batch processing windows if real-time is not needed.
Debounce internal events: Use message queues or event aggregation to avoid storms of duplicate work triggered by the same upstream event.
3. Review architectural intent
If a feature or component requires constant synthetic traffic to work reliably, consider whether the architectural pattern still fits your current usage model.
For example:
Could cold-starts be tolerated in certain paths?
Are there serverless components that would be cheaper on a dedicated SKU?
Is the retry logic spread across multiple layers with inconsistent behavior?
These are architectural questions. And they’re best solved through collaboration between architects, engineers, and business roles.
Awareness Beats Assumption
FinOps is not about racing to the lowest possible bill. It’s about maximizing business value. Sometimes, high availability, redundancy, or aggressive retry logic are worth the cost, because the business demands it. Other times, they’re artifacts of old assumptions that no longer hold true.
What matters is that those decisions are made intentionally.
Too often, cost becomes an afterthought in architecture discussions. But the truth is, architecture drives usage, and usage defines cost. If you design without cost in mind, you may be optimizing for a system that delivers technical elegance at an unsustainable price.
This is where FinOps shines: bringing cost awareness into architectural decisions without slowing them down. When architects, engineers, and FinOps practitioners collaborate, patterns like excessive retries, noisy health checks, and overzealous observability become design considerations, not surprises on the invoice.
So no, you don’t have to gut your design. But you do need to understand what it’s doing. And what it’s costing you.
FinOps helps you do exactly that.
Turn Anonymous Website Visitors Into Customers With Our AI BDR
Stop letting anonymous site traffic slip away. Our AI BDR Ava identifies individuals on your website without them providing any contact information and autonomously enrolls them into multi-channel sequences.
She operates within the Artisan platform, which consolidates every tool you need for outbound:
300M+ High-Quality B2B Prospects, including E-Commerce and Local Business Leads
Automated Lead Enrichment With 10+ Data Sources
Full Email Deliverability Management
Multi-Channel Outreach Across Email & LinkedIn
Human-Level Personalization
Convert warm leads into your next customers.
Please help me by visiting my sponsor. And interested in sponsoring yourself, then visit the sponsor page.
Thanks for reading this week’s edition. Share with your colleagues and make sure to subscribe to receive more weekly tips. See you next time!
P.S. I have another newsletter about GitHub, Azure, and .NET news. Subscribe as well to keep informed:
Reply